Cited by 1,261Organic Food and AgricultureSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisPlant and soil sciences

Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems

PIMENTEL, DAVID, HEPPERLY, PAUL, HANSON, JAMES, DOUDS, DAVID, SEIDEL, RITA·2005·BioScience

Abstract

Various organic technologies have been utilized for about 6000 years to make agriculture sustainable while conserving soil, water, energy, and biological resources. Among the benefits of organic technologies are higher soil organic matter and nitrogen, lower fossil energy inputs, yields similar to those of conventional systems, and conservation of soil moisture and water resources (especially advantageous under drought conditions). Conventional agriculture can be made more sustainable and ecologically sound by adopting some traditional organic farming technologies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0573:eeaeco]2.0.co;2

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maintaining the same fertilizer and soil-preparation practices in conventional farming leads to low soil moisture and low conservation levels.

    “Scientific results (Pimentel et al., 2005) have shown that this maintenance of these practices lead to low soil moisture status and low conservation levels of conventional farming systems.”

    From How energy innovation in indoor vertical farming can improve food security, sustainability, and food safety? (2020) · cites this paper as Pimentel et al., 2005

    The Results report significantly less soil water in the conventional system than in the organic legume system during the measured growing seasons. The Discussion also reports greater water conservation and less runoff in the organic systems. The paper does not establish that continuing the same fertilizer and soil-preparation practices caused those differences. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. BANR/NRC] Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, National Research Council. 2003. Frontiers in Agricultural Research: Food, Health, Envi- ronment, and Communities. Washington (DC): National Academies Press.
  2. Smith SE, Read DJ. 1997. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. 2nd ed. London: Aca- demic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PIMENTEL, D., HEPPERLY, P., HANSON, J., DOUDS, D., & SEIDEL, R.
Affiliations
Rodale Institute (US)
Venue
BioScience
Published
2005
Volume
55
Issue
7
Pages
573
ISSN
0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2180630498
Cited by
1,261
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 90 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 85 · 2012: 81
FWCI
37.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BioScience (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
  • VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • South Dakota State University
  • National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
  • Academia Sinica
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
Keywords
organic farming, conventional farming, sustainable agriculture, soil organic matter, soil nitrogen, crop yield, soil moisture conservation, water conservation, drought, economic comparison, energy comparison, environmental impact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review